Conclusion Without Evidence in Student Deaths : Vishal Pai Cacode

Margao: The recent conclusion drawn by the Government regarding the seven student deaths in Goa, attributing them to “suicides and exam pressure,” raises serious concerns, especially when forensic and scientific findings in several cases are still pending. Media reports clearly indicate that FSL reports are awaited and suspected narcotics use has emerged in at least one case. In such circumstances, arriving at sweeping conclusions appears premature and irresponsible, stated Vishal Pai Cacode, Political Analyst.

With the tragic death of a girl student two days ago, the total number of student deaths has now risen to eight. When investigations remain incomplete, any official narrative risks prejudicing facts and diverting attention from the real causes. Reducing such complex and tragic incidents merely to “exam pressure” oversimplifies the issue and may hinder a thorough and unbiased probe. The truth must emerge from evidence, not assumptions, Pai Cacode said.

He further stated that giving such information on the floor of the Goa Legislative Assembly carries even greater gravity. “The House is expected to function on verified facts and accountability. Presenting unverified claims as conclusions has the potential to mislead not only the members of the House but the entire state,” he maintained.

The families of the deceased students deserve clarity, justice, and transparency not conjecture. Any attempt to close the narrative without scientific confirmation undermines public trust and raises doubts about whether all angles, including external influences or substance abuse, are being honestly examined, Pai Cacode stated.

He therefore urged the Government to refrain from speculative statements, await the complete forensic reports, and place only verified facts before the House. Governance demands responsibility. Conclusions without evidence amount to misinformation and may well constitute a breach of privilege, he concluded.